Accordingly, this work begins to inform this research gap by focusing specifically on how the communication structure and interaction changes within AI-assisted human teams. Yet, there is still much to learn regarding how the integration of humans with AI agents into a team affects human behavior. Human-artificial intelligent (AI) - assisted teaming is becoming a strategy for coalescing the complementary strengths of humans and computers to solve difficult tasks. Overall, this dissertation lays the groundwork for a computational development and deployment of adaptive process management, with the hope to make engineering designs as efficient as possible. Across several dimensions, the overall results show that the AI manager agent introduced matches the capabilities of the human managers, showing potential in automating the management of a complex design process.Before and after analyses of the interventions indicate mixed adherence to the different types of interventions as induced in the intended process changes in the teams, and regression analyses show the impact of different interventions. Teams are also placed under the guidance of human process managers for comparison. The second framework creates an artificial intelligent process manager agent to manage the design process of engineering teams in real-time, tracking features of teams’ actions and communications during a complex design and path-planning task with multidisciplinary team members. Through a regression analysis, the results exhibit increased performance when capturing their design state and providing increased stimulus quality. Utilizing semantic comparisons between their current solution and a broad database of related example solutions, designers receive computationally selected inspirational stimuli midway through a problem-solving session. The first study analyzes the impact of modulating the distance of design stimuli from a designers’ current state, in this case, their current design solution, within a broader design space. Overall, these studies provide a conceptual basis for the detection and facilitation of design interventions based on real-time, discourse data.Next, two novel frameworks are studied, both of which take steps towards tracking features of design teams and utilizing that information to intervene. The results from his approach show that the impacts of these interventions can be computationally detected through team discourse. Motivated from these post-study interviews, a topic-modeling approach then analyzes team cognition and the impact of these process manager interventions. The managerial interactions with the design teams are investigated and post-study interviews with the human process managers are conducted, in an attempt to uncover some of the cognitive rationale and strategies that may be beneficial throughout problem solving. Exploiting this result, we consider and explore whether a human, process manager can lessen this underperformance of design teams compared to nominal teams, and help teams overcomepotential deterrents that may be contributing to their inferior performance. Through a behavioral study, our results corroborate previous findings, exhibiting that individuals outperform teams in the overall quality of their design solutions, even in this more free-flowing and explorative setting of conceptual design. This dissertation first compares individual versus group problem solving within the domain of engineering design. Thus, the overarching goal of this dissertation is to explore, better understand, and facilitate problem solving computationally, via adaptive, process management. However, methods for applying stimuli in the engineering design literature are largely static they do not adapt to the dynamics of either the designer or the design process, both of which evolve throughout the problem-solving process. Aid in the form of design stimuli catalyze group creativity and help designers overcome impasses. Even though teams collectively bring a diversity of knowledge and perspectives to problem solving, previous work has demonstrated that in certain scenarios, such as in language-based and configuration design problems, the production by a team is inferior to that of a similar number of individuals solving independently (i.e., nominal teams). Teams are a major facet of engineering and are commonly thought to be necessary when solving dynamic and complex problems, such as engineering design tasks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |